Originally Written 4.10.06 with minor edits
Liberalism is paternalistic and racist, and conservatism is stagnant and
impractical, pick your poison.
Liberal paternalism as represented by the Democratic party:
1) Seeks to erode our African Moral fiber by forcing us to party with individuals who represent moral positions abhorrent to us as Africans. It makes us passively accept post-modernism & relativism. It tells us to be effective we have to be aligned with other ‘agenda’s’ that in many cases are polar opposites of our fundamental world view. One such agenda is the homosexual agenda (Editor’s note: See Prop 8 Backlash 12.18.08).
2) It seeks to exploit our vote while not providing quid quo pro in terms of economic power, ownership, and independence. Since the Democrat ideal of social justices is rooted in civic equality and not economic equality its effect is to keep the average African American community in lower economic affluence. Because America is structured on instrumental capitalism the average African American community remains less powerful than the average white community. This is due to the reinforcing liberal paradigm of civic equality in lieu of economic power which is real power in America. Concurrently, modern liberal politics seeks to enact low level wealth redistribution plans but has absolutely no interest in creating what is necessary to revitalize our communities…BLACK POWER.
3) It is paternalistic and maintains a White Man as God “save a po’ Black” approach to politics and policy, by attempting to use the government (their party) as a Black family and Black power surrogate. Their execution of policy and their perception of social justice is the only perception tolerated when decisions are made on “the problem of race”. Those Blacks who counter their solutions to race, such as nationalist, reparationist, etc. are castigated as “Going contrary to Dr. King” and “Radical”, with the presumption that white derived liberalism ideology on race elevation is superior to Black derived perspectives on race elevation (Editors Note: Visit the forum democraticundergroun.com and talk Black elevation and see the responses you get 12.18.2008).
4) It is racist for the same reason that it is mentioned as paternalistic in the previous paragraph. Implicit in liberal sentiment is the under laying belief that we Blacks cannot be entrusted to A) Independently derive solutions to control our communities B) Independently support our families C) Independently educate our children, without needing white participation and white governance to do so.
—
The worst thing that could occur to the Democratic Party as it pertains to securing the Black vote is our holistic success as a people. Their whole paradigm in dealing with Blacks is highlighting things that are not done for Blacks in America, and then providing solutions in the form of programs that only they can provide for us (read that again and think about it). If we holistically have success, local community control, dynamic economic inner-cities, and a success for model for our own education, there is nothing left for them to ‘sell’ us. That is why it is incumbent on them to keep us in a status quo state or state of need.
Liberal politics and policies aren’t driven by Blacks for Blacks in an effort to create Black power, but by whites for Blacks in an effort to keep a Black voting block and maintain THEIR power.
So That’s why a black man is now…
THE Man!
Guffaws!
By: BT on December 19, 2008
at 9:38 pm
Because you paint you Camero a different color make it a Volvo?
By: Deus Ex Machina on December 22, 2008
at 3:06 pm
Liberalism and black interest in this country never has been anything but a forced marriage.
If you believe somehow that Liberal Paternalism draws its roots in some guilt associative race consciousness – then I suggest you spend some time in Appalachia, a Native American “Reservation”, and with Migrant Workers…
I did all three in a more idealistic portion of my youth.
Read up on H. Rap Brown for a synthesis (and origin) of the Liberal race guilt fantasy.
Funny thing about that Camaro – it was an “every mans sports car”.
You claim – Since the Democrat ideal of social justices is rooted in civic equality and not economic equality its effect is to keep the average African American community in lower economic affluence.
Which is interesting in light that the very same “Great Society” which existed for exactly 8 years under Kennedy and Johnson, while being thoroughly repudiated and submarined by Rethugly Presidents holding office for 28 of the last 40 years…
Should have such a death grip hold on conservative imaginations.
Especially in light of the fact that by almost every statistical economic measure, black folks have made the largest economic transition in the history of this country over the past 40 years…
And despite the fact that the leading negative economic indicators (unemployment and poverty) go up during each and every conservative Presidency.
And as you will recall, if you go back to your old site and pull up a few of my posts from 2-3 years back…
I predicted that conservatism would result in the greatest economic disaster since the Great Depression.
Black folks will bear a disproportionate burden of that failure as that great invisible black middle class appreciably shrinks, losing their principal investments.
What part of conservatism as economic policy is a failure is still hard to understand?
As to “Social Justice”, you already know my position is that the only equitable thing is to frogmarch every one of these chicken-fried SOBs who sold their country down the river to the nearest light post…
And hang ‘em.
Never let it be said that BT isn’t compassionate!
Now
By: BT on December 30, 2008
at 4:21 pm